[cici]

I have been pondering if to post to this or not, but oh well, here goes and here is my 2 cents worth.

I try to not to respond to posts where spankings and politics are together, because I don't think they go well together. I have voted both ways over the last several years and while there are things that I dislike about all Presidents, this post and its replies were too much.

First I honor President Bush and/or any President/man for that matter, for sticking to his personal morals and respecting his marriage vows by declining to touch another woman if that is what he and his wife have agreed upon.

I know this is a spanking site and a lot spanker's play, but some don't like to play, so what is the difference between spanking play and President Bush's decision? Are those here that don't like to play admonished and critizied for not playing? I surely hope not.

And since Bill Clinton was mentioned in the post....lets step back and recall his famous words to the People of the United States, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman". Suuuurrrre he didn't. That's why I guess he had to come back later and admit he did. All in OUR Oval Office this happened I might add. Instead of getting to leave the White House quietly after serving his eight years, he leaves with a scandal going on and almost being impeached for perjury.

Now if President Bush had spanked that young woman's bottom, the media out there would have put him in the same category as Bill Clinton. Yes there are things I don't agree with President Bush on but I certainly do not want him or anyone else for that matter, in the same category as Bill Clinton.

Well that is my two cents worth, and now lets please get back to what this website is for and why we joined it! SPANKING!!!!!!!!